Fisting Fiasco

Yesterday saw the posting of Chloe’s I Came, Did You? from Elegant Angel. Scene 3 is an all girl threesome featuring Chloe, Shelby Myne, and Tina Tyler. Some fifteen minutes into the scene (15:13), Chloe lays back into the arms of Shelby. Tina approaches and the pink glove covering her hand, wrist, and forearm is a not so subtle hint that Tina’s intentions go way beyond lightly stroking Chloe’s outer labia. Just as Tina is about to plunge her entire hand into Chloe’s pussy, a black box appears on the screen, obliterating the action.



In this post, Alison informs, “There is no law prohibiting fisting in porn in the US. It’s widely considered a no-no, however, because in 1999, Seymore Butts was prosecuted for obscenity for a double fisting scene ….”

Should fisting be censored? Let’s do an old-fashioned poll. Old fashioned in that I don’t know how to insert the poll where you click in a yes or no answer. Therefore, you’ll have to manually respond to the post. Tell me Yes, fisting should be censored, we may go blind if allowed to see what actually takes place behind the black box. Or tell me No, fisting should not be censored; it’s mild compared to the choking, slapping, spitting, hair pulling, toilet dunking, etc. already depicted. Feel free to elaborate upon your answer.

pixel

Be Sociable, Share!

Tags: , ,


54 Responses to “Fisting Fiasco”

  1. ILoveCock Says:

    no way..its not offensive!

  2. guyvader722 Says:

    no. is it the fact that its someones fist and arm, because they use dildos that are shaped the same or just as big. in any event the black bar is a little much, in some japanese porn the pixelate and you can still kind of see whats going on. a black bar makes me thing that something actually horrable is going on like blood gushing out, or you can see her hand clearly in her abdommon. once again no censor on fisting.

  3. Jim Says:

    No, I agree fisting should not be censored. The primary reason I am against the censorship of fisting is the plethoa of porn scenes, distributed in the United States, depicting sexual acts of an equal or greater degree of extreme physical contact between actors which are allowed to go uncensored. Sexual acts of this level of contact include, in my opinion, torture, choking, gagging, and slapping. I see no reason why fisting should be censored when these sexual acts are not. I believe any mainstream sexual act – fisting is definitely mainstream – should be made available for each viewer to decide if they wish to view it or not.

    On another note, in April of this year, in the post “So You Want to See Some Fisting?” concerning the fisting scene in the classic movie, “Candy Strippers”, Alison commented to a fellow viewer, “…when our new categories finally roll out (in a few months), there will be a fisting category.” What is the status of the addition of a fisting category? Would this happen before the end of the year?

  4. Bhazor Says:

    No, I don’t think any porn should be censored when all involved are consenting adults.

    But I do think this site needs more descriptive tags so that it is easier to avoid the stuff that makes you squeamish. In my case that would be anal cream pies, transexuals, male penetration and yes fisting. Also as your library expands this issue will become more pronounced. If you’re looking for an example of tagging I think ********** has the best tag system around though it could do with an editor.