<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Would You Vote for Stormy Daniels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 14:49:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: doppyman</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-14154</link>
		<dc:creator>doppyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-14154</guid>
		<description>I know no one&#039;s reading this topic anymore, but I would like to add that Vitter has been tied to a call girl ring in the New Orleans area, and it appears that he likes to do some fetish stuff, including, apparently, infantilism.  This has earned him the nickname Diaper Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know no one&#8217;s reading this topic anymore, but I would like to add that Vitter has been tied to a call girl ring in the New Orleans area, and it appears that he likes to do some fetish stuff, including, apparently, infantilism.  This has earned him the nickname Diaper Dave.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zarafan</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13720</link>
		<dc:creator>zarafan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 23:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13720</guid>
		<description>I think Doppyman raises a valid point, as usual, in this context: Stormy could do a lot more to earn my vote on the VB website, at least, by doing anal... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Doppyman raises a valid point, as usual, in this context: Stormy could do a lot more to earn my vote on the VB website, at least, by doing anal&#8230; <img src='http://blog.videobox.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13714</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13714</guid>
		<description>PS-  In response to the question, if Stormy was willing to consult the Constitution and Bill of Rights before voting for or against a piece of legislation, then she&#039;d get my vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS-  In response to the question, if Stormy was willing to consult the Constitution and Bill of Rights before voting for or against a piece of legislation, then she&#8217;d get my vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13713</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13713</guid>
		<description>Honestly, Stormy is safer in porn.  You saw what happened to the DC madam.  A conveniently timed &quot;suicide&quot; just before she was about to testify about her client list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, Stormy is safer in porn.  You saw what happened to the DC madam.  A conveniently timed &#8220;suicide&#8221; just before she was about to testify about her client list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Typvgs</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13707</link>
		<dc:creator>Typvgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13707</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t we all just get along?? :-)

Seriously, I think the idea of having two &#039;heads&#039; of a political entity is a good one----one taking on the organizational work (the &quot;decider&quot;), the other a figurehead.

It would lend a better balance to public representation.

Go Stormy! (For co-Governor.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t we all just get along?? <img src='http://blog.videobox.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Seriously, I think the idea of having two &#8216;heads&#8217; of a political entity is a good one&#8212;-one taking on the organizational work (the &#8220;decider&#8221;), the other a figurehead.</p>
<p>It would lend a better balance to public representation.</p>
<p>Go Stormy! (For co-Governor.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: caamtrax691</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13677</link>
		<dc:creator>caamtrax691</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13677</guid>
		<description>Yes i would, after all I wrote in Mary Carey&#039;s name because the two idiots offered for prez, were not and are not worth shit. Obama may have won but I can now bitch, complain, and moan, just because I DID VOTE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i would, after all I wrote in Mary Carey&#8217;s name because the two idiots offered for prez, were not and are not worth shit. Obama may have won but I can now bitch, complain, and moan, just because I DID VOTE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doppyman</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13676</link>
		<dc:creator>doppyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 06:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13676</guid>
		<description>Ok, in deference to you, Rope, I&#039;ll cut it short and not respond to Harstad again. 

But, before I stop, I will only add that the Republicans court the Christian right and are willing to install the policies of the Christian in exchange for their votes.  We already have a Supreme Court one vote short of being willing to overturn all of the reform rulings from the mid-1950s on.  I won&#039;t say what this means in terms of birth control, abortion and gay and civil rights issues.  I will say that it would strongly impact the obscenity laws.  We had the Meese commission under Reagan and the Justice Department prosecution of John Stagliano (regarded the father of gonzo porn!!!) under the last president.  Unchecked Republican power could eventually lead to the end of Videobox and perhaps even prosecutions for the possession of pornography!!!

I would vote for Stormy if she ran against Vitter.  I might even work for her campaign, provided she would agree to help work out a deal with Wicked Pictures so that their stuff could be on Videobox.  This might be difficult, because as far as I know, Stormy is not known for back door deals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, in deference to you, Rope, I&#8217;ll cut it short and not respond to Harstad again. </p>
<p>But, before I stop, I will only add that the Republicans court the Christian right and are willing to install the policies of the Christian in exchange for their votes.  We already have a Supreme Court one vote short of being willing to overturn all of the reform rulings from the mid-1950s on.  I won&#8217;t say what this means in terms of birth control, abortion and gay and civil rights issues.  I will say that it would strongly impact the obscenity laws.  We had the Meese commission under Reagan and the Justice Department prosecution of John Stagliano (regarded the father of gonzo porn!!!) under the last president.  Unchecked Republican power could eventually lead to the end of Videobox and perhaps even prosecutions for the possession of pornography!!!</p>
<p>I would vote for Stormy if she ran against Vitter.  I might even work for her campaign, provided she would agree to help work out a deal with Wicked Pictures so that their stuff could be on Videobox.  This might be difficult, because as far as I know, Stormy is not known for back door deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zarafan</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13658</link>
		<dc:creator>zarafan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13658</guid>
		<description>Right as ever, Rope: (1) I don&#039;t think she&#039;ll run; (2) I&#039;m anticipating there will be other candidates more electable than she to choose from; (3) in a two-way race between her and Vitter, I&#039;d choose her. Hands down.

Zarafan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right as ever, Rope: (1) I don&#8217;t think she&#8217;ll run; (2) I&#8217;m anticipating there will be other candidates more electable than she to choose from; (3) in a two-way race between her and Vitter, I&#8217;d choose her. Hands down.</p>
<p>Zarafan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ropeadope</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13657</link>
		<dc:creator>ropeadope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13657</guid>
		<description>Guys, I believe we&#039;re moving a bit too far afield from the questions Alison presented to us. Not saying these aren&#039;t interesting topics worthy of discussion. I just don&#039;t feel VideoBox is the proper arena for such discussions to take place. Please narrow your focus. Do you think Stormy will run for office? If so, would you vote for her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, I believe we&#8217;re moving a bit too far afield from the questions Alison presented to us. Not saying these aren&#8217;t interesting topics worthy of discussion. I just don&#8217;t feel VideoBox is the proper arena for such discussions to take place. Please narrow your focus. Do you think Stormy will run for office? If so, would you vote for her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zarafan</title>
		<link>http://blog.videobox.com/blog/index.php/2009/02/04/would-you-vote-for-stormy-daniels/comment-page-1/#comment-13654</link>
		<dc:creator>zarafan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.videobox.com/blog/?p=1119#comment-13654</guid>
		<description>Dear Harstad,

As far as government making the economy worse, I&#039;m wondering where you&#039;ve been over the last few months? Do you think the economy is in such great shape now? Do you think that giving CEOs more leeway than they already have will ensure better results? Do you think there would be positive consequences in maintaining the policies that have been in place for the past decade?

In the supermarket yesterday the guys at the fish counter were listening to talk radio--it sounded like Rush Limbaugh or one of his clones. The person on the radio was saying that we&#039;re &quot;watching the disappearance of our republic&quot; and its replacement by some kind of Orwellian socialist state. The reason he offered for this happening was because &quot;when people are too complacent, too comfortable with their material possessions, they lose sight of their priorities and cede their future to the politicians.&quot;

Yeah, the reason why people voted for President Obama is because they&#039;re feeling too comfortable right now; they&#039;re insufficiently worried about their future. Right. What planet do these people live on?

Vote Quimby,

Zarafan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Harstad,</p>
<p>As far as government making the economy worse, I&#8217;m wondering where you&#8217;ve been over the last few months? Do you think the economy is in such great shape now? Do you think that giving CEOs more leeway than they already have will ensure better results? Do you think there would be positive consequences in maintaining the policies that have been in place for the past decade?</p>
<p>In the supermarket yesterday the guys at the fish counter were listening to talk radio&#8211;it sounded like Rush Limbaugh or one of his clones. The person on the radio was saying that we&#8217;re &#8220;watching the disappearance of our republic&#8221; and its replacement by some kind of Orwellian socialist state. The reason he offered for this happening was because &#8220;when people are too complacent, too comfortable with their material possessions, they lose sight of their priorities and cede their future to the politicians.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, the reason why people voted for President Obama is because they&#8217;re feeling too comfortable right now; they&#8217;re insufficiently worried about their future. Right. What planet do these people live on?</p>
<p>Vote Quimby,</p>
<p>Zarafan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
