AIDS Group Petitions CAL/OSHA to Mandate Condom Use in Porn Production – What Do You Think?
In June of this year, a porn performer tested positive for HIV. To make matters worse, she was hired to work immediately before she was tested (or after, depending on who you ask) even though it had been over a month since her last test. The fear was that she had exposed her co-stars to the disease. Thankfully, none of her partners contracted HIV.
A scandal involving the industry’s testing service, Adult Industry Medical (AIM), erupted and accusations of hiding positive tests, skewing numbers and generally being incompetent began to fly. Amid all of this, the AIDS Healthcare Foundation (AHF) launched a campaign to require condom-use in California, which brings us to yesterday.
The AHF filed a petition to amend California’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (CAL/OSHA) rules regarding blood-borne pathogens to mandate that condoms must be used by all porn performers in the state. This has been wholly rejected by the industry for a variety of reasons, ranging from performer safety to loss of profits. Accepted wisdom in the adult industry is that condom porn doesn’t sell.
So I’m curious what you, the consumer, thinks about this subject. Is requiring condoms a good idea? I’ve expressed my opinion in another forum, but I really want to hear from you. Participate in the poll below and feel free to share your opinions in the comments as well. This issue has the potential to radically change the way pornography is made and very few people are discussing the impact on the customer.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Further reading:
‘Handful’ of Adult Performers Quarantined After Positive HIV Test
Not-So-Safe Sex
AHF Petitions Cal/OSHA to Amend Regulation, Explicitly Require Condoms in Porn
FSC Lobbies Against Potential Mandatory Condom Legislation
The Coming Condom Law
Porn Performers’ Health: Why the System is Broken










